Economic headwinds for the agricultural equipment market
![](https://images.ctfassets.net/mmptj4yas0t3/5Hgt9iwMnfF28hjIAkraAH/6d069803f0dc7143d2b888aea9392c49/econ-steel-image.jpg?w=750&h=423&fl=progressive&q=50&fm=jpg)
This outlook highlights key trends for Canadian manufacturers of agricultural equipment as the pre-order season for the 2025 production line approaches while keeping an eye towards 2026.
Key observations
Canadian manufacturing sales (nominal) are projected to decline 2.2% in 2024
Slow sales growth in the years ahead due to lower farm profitability
Economic slowdown points to slower growth rate on raw material and labour costs
Growing U.S. protectionism could impact steel and agricultural markets
The Canadian agricultural equipment manufacturing sector experienced softer sales through the first quarter this year. Sales declined 5.1% from the same period in 2023 but remain above historical levels (Figure 1). Our latest projections suggest sales will decline -2.2% this year, a significant revision down from our earlier estimate of an 8.4% increase. The decline is due to tighter farm profitability, high equipment prices, and elevated interest rates. While sales are projected to dip this year, growth is expected to resume in the years ahead as farm profitability improves.
Figure 1: Canadian agricultural equipment manufacturing sales
![A figure illustrating historical Canadian agricultural equipment manufacturing nominal sales and projections.](https://images.ctfassets.net/mmptj4yas0t3/3BjH7XhninCjUMWCSguDBk/c2cce316256ad0e37c6d6b6e5e804eec/econ-e-20240612-fig1.png?w=750&h=423&q=50&fm=png)
Sources: Statistics Canada, FCC calculations
A slowdown in Canadian sales this year was always in the cards. For starters, large U.S. agricultural equipment manufacturers had already begun to curtail production in response to declining demand. It was just a matter of time before the same happened north of the border as well. Also, sales trends between Canada and the U.S diverged following the pandemic (Figure 2), with 2023 sales surging this side of the border after supply chain issues were sorted out. After such a solid year, a slowdown was inevitable.
Figure 2 : Canadian and U.S agriculture equipment manufacturing sales measured in Canadian dollars
![A figure illustrating historical Canadian and U.S. agricultural equipment manufacturing sales](https://images.ctfassets.net/mmptj4yas0t3/1J9qAbUoiSqErSkKZa4BBm/561109c10798c49130efac7d9bdfc555/econ-e-20240612-fig2.png?w=750&h=323&q=50&fm=png)
Sources: Statistics Canada, U.S. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Higher equipment prices, as opposed to volume, are largely responsible for U.S. agriculture manufacturing sales growing 20% in the first quarter of the year. However, the large U.S. agricultural manufactures are forecasting approximately 10 to 15% declines in large agricultural equipment sales this year and are accordingly cutting production to keep inventories in line with demand. While U.S. manufacturing inventory values have declined slightly so far this year, they are expected to remain elevated (Figure 3). A similar trend is occurring here as slowing Canadian agricultural manufacturing sales and rising equipment prices have resulted in rising inventories.
Figure 3: North American equipment manufacturing inventory values remain historically high
![A figure illustrating historical Canadian and U.S. inventory values.](https://images.ctfassets.net/mmptj4yas0t3/5t2iT4ORNOYWX9LCz2Mgrr/fd7910517e5fc4ed32d982a7c342c7fa/econ-e-20240612-fig3.png?w=750&h=318&q=50&fm=png)
Sources: Statistics Canada, U.S. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
A positive story amongst the large U.S. manufacturers is that the above-mentioned curtailment in production has allowed them to focus resources on producing equipment that is in high demand (e.g. high clearance sprayers) and reducing the time from order to customer delivery. Canadian manufacturers may be in a similar situation as most are small niche manufacturers.
Other factors to consider
Canadian dollar and interest rates
Production costs
The Bank of Canada cut the overnight rate in June to 4.75% and signaled additional cuts ahead. If, as expected, there are another 50 basis points by year-end, the interest rate spread with the US could widen further, weighing on the Canadian dollar in the process. A lower dollar would help export competitiveness, but it also means higher import costs related to raw materials. This period of currency weakness isn’t expected to last, as the US Federal Reserve is also set to cut its own interest rate later this year, which will pressure the US dollar.
Manufacturing outlook: labour and raw material costs
Much like farmers focus on their per acre equipment costs, equipment manufacturers also pay close attention to their costs. Labour and raw materials account for approximately 20% and 65% of total expenses, respectively. Growth in wages paid by equipment manufacturers has trended higher during the first three months of the year with an average growth rate of 5.7%. Wage growth is expected to moderate as the Canadian economy slows, along with potentially increasing the supply of qualified workers available to be hired by for manufacturers.
Various prefabricated metal and steel products are the main raw materials. The U.S. Midwest steel futures contract, which is used as a proxy for costs, is currently trading sideways (Figure 4). Slowing global demand and potential oversupply in places like China could result in prices trending lower.
Figure 4: U.S. Midwest steel futures trending sideways
![A figure illustrating U.S. steel futures in U.S. dollars.](https://images.ctfassets.net/mmptj4yas0t3/1ie1qNRlERMOMQhDAzKpfV/adf1a23b6ac2b5434ac158cfd4cf7276/econ-e-20240612-fig4.png?w=750&h=380&q=50&fm=png)
Sources: Barchart, FCC calculations
Steel tariffs: will agriculture face retaliation?
There is uncertainty following the U.S. announcing it will re-impose tariffs (up to 25%) on certain Chinese steel and aluminum products on August 1, 2024. History can give us clues on what might unfold with U.S. steel tariffs.
The U.S. imposed numerous steel and aluminum trade tariffs in 2018 with several trading partners, including Canada and China. These trade barriers increased production costs as tariffs were applied each time a product crossed the border. In equipment manufacturing certain components may cross the border multiple times prior to ending up in agriculture equipment. Further impacting the agriculture economy that year, agricultural markets were caught in the crossfire of the trade tensions. U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum imports was met by retaliation on U.S. exports of agriculture and food products. China’s 25% tariff on U.S. soybeans weakened the demand for U.S. soybeans, which resulted in price declines and lost revenues for Canadian farmers.
As we continue to approach the 2024 U.S. elections, expect to see growing U.S. protectionism, regardless of any potential changes in U.S. administration leadership.
Canadian manufacturers must also think of the possibility of falling demand for raw materials and resulting downward price pressures prices. On the flipside, tariffs could lead to rising costs. Evaluating raw material needs and planning cost-effective purchases based upon various scenarios for 2025 and 2026 will be imperative to support profitability.
Bottom line
Tighter profitability has farms placing a greater emphasis on their per acre equipment costs, reducing demand for equipment. Manufacturing equipment sales are projected to experience slow growth in the coming years. Global trade tensions and the evolution of agricultural commodity prices are key drivers of the trends in the demand for farm equipment.
Senior Economist
Leigh Anderson is a Senior Economist at FCC with experience in agricultural markets and risk. He specializes in monitoring and analyzing FCC’s portfolio, industry health and providing industry risk analysis. In addition to his speaking engagements on agriculture and economics, Leigh is a regular contributor to the FCC Economics blog.
Leigh came to FCC in 2015, joining the Economics team. Prior to FCC, he worked in the policy branch of the Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture. He holds a master’s degree in agricultural economics from the University of Saskatchewan.